Grants vs. Private Funding: Pros, Cons, and Navigating Delays
By JoeVu, at: 12:39 Ngày 19 tháng 8 năm 2025
Thời gian đọc ước tính: __READING_TIME__ phút
Introduction
Securing funding is one of the biggest challenges for startups and SMEs. Between government grants and private capital (e.g., venture capital, angel investors), founders must choose wisely. In this post, we explore how to navigate this landscape using the recent NSW MVP Ventures Program delay as a case study and compare how Australia and Vietnam approach funding for innovation.
The Story: NSW MVP Ventures Delays
The NSW government allocated AU$6 million to extend the MVP Ventures Program to 2029 but postponed launching the 2025–26 grant round without public notice, leaving startups in limbo. Many are still waiting to sign agreements for previously approved grants.
-
Pros: Non-dilutive capital, government endorsement, and added credibility.
-
Cons: Unpredictable timing, bureaucratic delays, and potential disruption to business plans.
For context, see SmartCompany’s coverage of the MVP grant delay.
Australia vs. Vietnam: Funding Landscape
Metric | Australia | Vietnam |
---|---|---|
AI adoption (SMEs) | 0–4 emp: 33% • 200–500 emp: 82% (NAIC Q1 2025) | 44% cite AI as top investment (2024) (CSIRO/Aus4Innovation) |
Online sales adoption | 39% earn ≥10% revenue online (CPA Australia) | E‑commerce rising; SEA to USD 39B by 2025 (e‑Conomy SEA) |
Funding maturity | Structured grants (e.g., MVP Ventures); recent delays (SmartCompany) | Fewer grants; fast‑growing private AI investment (CSIRO) |
Pros & Cons: Grants vs. Private Funding
Government Grants
- Equity-free capital
- Added legitimacy
- Uncertain timelines
- Administrative burden
Private Funding (VC, Angels)
- Faster to access
- Often comes with mentorship and networks
- Dilutes ownership
- Highly competitive; women founders face <0.5% of VC funding in Australia (Cut Through Venture Data)
Tips to Navigate Funding Uncertainty
-
Don’t wait for grants to build: Start your MVP and seek alternative funding paths while waiting on grant results.
-
Diversify your sources: Mix grants, accelerator programs, and angel deals in Australia; tap into Vietnam’s growing private rounds.
-
Validate with traction: Use customer sign-ups, pilot projects, or partnerships to prove market demand.
-
Invest in funding readiness: Have a strong pitch deck, clean financials, and clear milestones to impress both grant assessors and investors.
How Glinteco Can Help
At Glinteco, we:
-
Build lean, functional MVPs to prove traction fast.
-
Create funding readiness packages (pitch decks, projections, validation collateral).
-
Offer flexible, phased deliverables to preserve cash flow while maintaining progress.
Mistakes to Avoid
-
Relying solely on a single grant.
-
Ignoring alternative funding options in your market.
-
Skipping MVP testing before approaching funders.
Recommended Reading
-
Venture Deals - Brad Feld & Jason Mendelson
-
The Lean Startup - Eric Ries
-
Build the Damn Thing - Kathryn Finney
Final Thoughts
Whether you’re navigating grant delays in Australia or chasing Vietnam’s AI funding surge, the strategy is the same:
keep building, stay agile, and diversify your funding sources.
With a partner like Glinteco, you can maintain momentum regardless of the funding climate so when the right grant or investor comes along, you’re ready to close the deal.